This paper is about the Sigmaster's Conjecture, which to this day s...
To prove the $O( \log a)$ bound we start by defining $N(a)$ as the ...
In 2007, Daniel Kane, a mathematician from Harvard, was able to [im...
3003 occurs twice in its own row, twice in row 78 and twice in rows...
1971] RESEARCH PROBLEMS 385
and so
2
(6)
Z2
<
I
+
2
-
Since X, Y, Z
are
positive integers, inequality (6)
implies that Z can take only
a
finite number of values.
The same
holds for
Y
(on
using (5)) and X (on using
(3) or the relation
X
< Y+Z).
Since X+ Y+Z =,uA,
A
takes only a finite number
of values. So do the
sides
a, b, c,
in
view
of relations
(2). Thus
N(O)
is finite
for each positive X>
2.
If
'X
\2
(i.e.,
,Zb 1), we obtain the same conclusion
on using the second
in-
equality
in
(4)
and
proceeding
as before.
We
shall next
show
that
N(X)
=
0 for
X>
V8
(i.e.,
A>
V2).
For such
a
value
of
A
we
have from
(6)
that Z =1. The
relation (5)
then shows
that
Y=
1. Since
X< Y+Z,
we
now
have
X= 1.
Using relations (3)
and
(2),
one obtains
;=
3,
A=V\3,
a=b=c=2.
REMARKS. The remarks made at the beginning
of this note show that
N(1)
=
5
and
N(2)
=1.
Our theorem shows that
N(3)
=
N(4)
=
*
=
0.
It
would be interesting to consider a similar problem
for
a
quadrilateral,
and
in
general,
a
polygon
of
n sides (n> 2).
RESEARCH
PROBLEMS
EDITED By RICHARD
GuY
In
this
Department
the
Monthly
presents easily
stated
research problems dealing
with
notions
ordinarily encountered in
undergraduate mathematics. Each problem should be
accompanied
by relevant references (if any
are
known
to
the author) and by a brief description
of
known
partial
results.
Material should
be
sent to Richard
Guy, Department of
Mathematics, Statis-
tics,
and
Computing Science,
The
University of Calgary, Calgary
44, Alberta,
Canada.
HOW OFTEN DOES
AN
INTEGER OCCUR AS A BINOMIAL
COEFFICIENT?
DAVID
SINGMASTER, Polytechnic of the
South
Bank,
London
Let N(a) be the number
of times a occurs as a binomial
coefficient, (X). We
have
N(1) =oo, N(2) 1,
N(3) =N(4) N(5) =2, N(6) =3,
etc.
Clearly,
for
a>
1, N(a) <
oo.
Below we establish that
N(a)
=
O(log a). We
conjecture that
N(a)
=
0(1), that is, that the
number of solutions of
()
=a is
bounded for a >
1.
Erd6s,
in
a
private
communication, concurs in this conjecture and
states that it
must be very hard. In a later
communication, he suggests trying
to show N(a)
=
O(log log a).
If
we let
M(k)
be the
first integer
a
such that N(a)
=-k,
we
have: M(1) =2,
M(2)
=
3, M(3)
=
6, M(4)
=
10, M(6)
=
120. The next values would
be interesting
to know.
This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Mon, 22 Dec 2014 21:33:41 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
386
R. A.
DUKE
[April
PROPOSITION.
N(a)
=
O(log a).
Proof:
Let b be
the
first b
such
that (2)
>
a.
Now
is
monotonically
increasing in
i and
inj;
hence
b+i+b+
)
b
+
b
+
2b
Thus
(+J)
=
a
implies
i
<
b
or
j <
b.
Again
by
monotonicity, for
each value
of
i
(orj),
has at
most one
solution.
Hence
N(a) <
2b.
Now
(>)
_ 2",
so
we have
(
b(b-1)
hence
b
?<log2
a
+ 1,
and
N(a)
?
2
+2
log2
a
=
O(log
a).
Added in
Proof:
I
have
recently
found that
M(8)
=
3003
and
this is the
only
solution to
N(a)
>
8
with
a
<
223.
There
are
six solutions
to
N(a)
=
6
with
a
<
223,
namely:
120,
210,
1540,
7140,
11628, and 24310.
HOW
IS A
GRAPH'S
BETTI
NUMBER
RELATED
TO
ITS
GENUS?
R. A.
DUKE,
University of
Washington
If a
connected
graph G
has v
vertices
and e
edges, the
number
1
-v+e
is
called
the
(1-dimensional)
Betti number
of
G,
denoted
by
:l(G).
This
value,
which is
nonnegative
for
connected
G, was
one of the
first
numerical
characteris-
tics
of
a
graph
studied,
having been
introduced by
von
Staudt [11]
and
Kirch-
hoff
[5]. The
Betti
number
:l(G)
is
also the
rank of
the
fundamental
group
of G
(see
[9],
Ch.
6)
and
is
related
to the
Euler
characteristic of G,
x(G),
by the
equa-
tion
:3(G)
= 1
-X(G).
The
genus of a
graph is
defined in
terms
of its
embeddings in
compact,
closed,
orientable
2-dimensional
manifolds.
Each
such
manifold
can be formed
by
attaching
an
appropriate
number of
"handles" to a
copy of
the
2-sphere.
For
a
manifold M,
the
number of
handles
required
is
called the
genus of
M,
denoted
by
'y(M),
and
is
related to
the Euler
characteristic
of M by
the formula
2'y(M)
=
2-x(M).
Each
graph can
be
embedded
in some
orientable
2-manifold
by
placing
itsvertices on
the
2-sphere and
attaching one
handle to
accommodate
each
edge.
In
general,
however,
such a
construction
yields a
manifold
of
unneces-
This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Mon, 22 Dec 2014 21:33:41 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Discussion

3003 occurs twice in its own row, twice in row 78 and twice in rows 14 and 15. $$ \binom{3003}{1} = \binom{78}{2} = \binom{15}{5} = \binom{14}{6} $$ Additionally, it’s the only number known to appear 8 or more times. There are also no known integers which occur in the triangle exactly five or seven times. To prove the $O( \log a)$ bound we start by defining $N(a)$ as the number of solutions of $a=\binom{i+j}{j}=\binom{i+j}{i}$ , with $i,j \geq 1$ (since Pascal's triangle is symmetrical along its central column). Since, $\binom{i+j}{i}$ increases in each of $i$ and $j$ (in other words, if you pick a diagonal and follow it down or pick a column and follow it down the binomial coefficients will always increase), any choice of $i$ or $j$ admits a new solution value for $N(a)$. Now let's suppose that $a$ satisfies $a \leq \binom{2b}{b}$ implies that $i$ or $j < b$, so the solution count $N(a)≤ 2b$. Take the least such $b$. Then $2^{b-1} ≤\binom{2(b−1)}{b−1}≤ a$, $b ≤1+\log_2 a$, and $N(a) ≤ 2 + 2 \log_2 a = O(\log a)$ In 2007, Daniel Kane, a mathematician from Harvard, was able to [improve the result and the current best bound](http://www.emis.de/journals/INTEGERS/papers/h53/h53.pdf) is: $$ N(t) = O\big(\frac{(\log t)(\log \log \log t)}{ (\log \log \ t)^2} \big) $$ This paper is about the Sigmaster's Conjecture, which to this day still remains unsolved. The author, David Singmaster, is an American mathematician who is known for is mathematical puzzles as well as for his mathematical analysis of Rubik's Cube. ![](https://media.springernature.com/original/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00283-018-9811-9/MediaObjects/283_2018_9811_Figa_HTML.jpg) To understand his conjecture let's first talk about Pascal's Triangle. Pascal's triangle is a number triangle with numbers arranged in staggered rows such that each number is the sum of the two numbers above (starting with 1) and also a binomial coefficient. His conjecture states that we can find a number $a$, so that no value occurs in Pascal’s triangle more than $a$ times ($a \neq 1$). $$ N(a)< \infty $$ ![](https://i.imgur.com/rInVEMh.png)